首页> 外文OA文献 >What patients do and their impact on implementation process and outcomes during (and after) participatory quality improvement projects in English acute hospitals: Reflections from an ethnographic study
【2h】

What patients do and their impact on implementation process and outcomes during (and after) participatory quality improvement projects in English acute hospitals: Reflections from an ethnographic study

机译:在英国急诊医院参与性质量改善项目期间(及之后),患者做什么以及对实施过程和结果的影响:人种学研究的思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

– The potential for including patients in implementation processes has received limited attention in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to explore the different roles adopted by 63 patients that emerged during and after four participatory quality improvement interventions, and the nature of their impact upon implementation processes and outcomes.– A cross-case ethnographic comparison of Experience-based Co-design in two clinical pathways in two UK NHS Trusts.– Two key themes emerge from the data. First, the authors found a range of different roles adopted by patients within and across the four projects; some were happy to share their experiences, others also helped to identify improvement priorities alongside staff whilst others were also involved in developing potential solutions with the staff who had cared for them. A few participants also helped implement those solutions and became “experts by experience” through engaging in the whole co-design process. Second, in terms of the impact of patient engagement with the co-design process whilst the changes championed by patients and carers were often small scale, as co-designers patients provided innovative ideas and solutions. Through their involvement and contributions they also acted as catalysts for broader change in the attitudes of staff by providing a motivation for wider organisational and attitudinal changes.– The research was conducted in two clinical pathways in two NHS trusts. However, the findings complement and add to the growing body of knowledge on experience based co-design.– Patient engagement is likely to require support and facilitation to ensure that patients can play a meaningful role as partners and co-designers in service improvement and implementation. Different roles suited particular individuals, with participants stepping in and out of the co-design process at various stages as suited their needs, capacities and (albeit sometimes perceptions re) skills. In this context, facilitation needs to be sensitive to individual needs and flexible to support involvement.– Patients and carers can play active roles in service improvement, particularly where the approach facilitate active engagement as co-designers.– Analysis of the role patients and carers in implementation and improvement.
机译:–在实施过程中使患者包括在内的潜力在文献中很少受到关注。本文的目的是探讨63例患者在四种参与式质量改进干预措施期间和之后出现的不同作用,以及它们对实施过程和结果的影响的性质。 -在两个英国NHS信托中的两个临床途径中进行设计。–数据中出现了两个关键主题。首先,作者发现患者在四个项目中和整个四个项目中所扮演的一系列不同角色。一些人乐于分享他们的经验,另一些人还与员工一起帮助确定了改进重点,而另一些人也与照顾他们的员工一起参与了潜在解决方案的开发。一些参与者还通过参与整个协同设计过程来帮助实现了这些解决方案,并成为了“经验丰富的专家”。其次,就患者参与共同设计过程的影响而言,患者和护理人员所倡导的变化通常规模很小,因为共同设计者患者提供了创新的想法和解决方案。通过他们的参与和贡献,他们还通过激励组织和态度的更广泛变化,推动了员工态度的更广泛变化。–该研究是在两个NHS信托中的两种临床途径中进行的。但是,这些发现补充并增加了基于经验的协同设计知识的增长。–患者参与可能需要支持和协助,以确保患者可以在改善和实施服务中作为合作伙伴和协同设计师发挥有意义的作用。不同的角色适合特定的个人,参与者可以根据自己的需求,能力和(尽管有时会重新认识)技能,在各个阶段进入和退出协同设计过程。在这种情况下,便利化需要对个人需求敏感并且要灵活地支持参与。–患者和护理人员可以在改善服务中发挥积极作用,尤其是在这种方法促进共同设计者积极参与的情况下。–对患者和护理人员的作用进行分析在实施和改进中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号